Canadian Employment Law Today

November 17, 2021

Focuses on human resources law from a business perspective, featuring news and cases from the courts, in-depth articles on legal trends and insights from top employment lawyers across Canada.

Issue link: https://digital.hrreporter.com/i/1428524

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 4 of 7

Canadian HR Reporter, 2021 directly to top management. The court also found that economic con- ditions in the global oil market created diffi- culties for both the Total group of companies and the Calgary economy. This also affected Cordeau-Chatelain's ability to find employ- ment after her termination — she didn't find suitable employment until July 2020, more than three years later, and it was in a differ- ent profession in a different city. After three years of unsuccessful searching, Cordeau- Chatalain retrained as an executive coach and found a job in Vancouver as a leadership coach. The court also considered the fact that Cordeau-Chatelain had been living in Paris, France, for more than three years at the time of her termination. This caused her to lose touch with her network of business contacts back in Canada. These factors made her search for new employment more difficult, the court said. Finally, the court noted that her gender was another factor limiting her job pros - pects at the management level of the in- dustry, particularly when combined with her age. The court determined that Cordeau-Chat- elain was entitled to 18 months' notice. It dis- agreed with TEPCA's argument that because she didn't use outplacement counselling that it offered her, she didn't mitigate her losses. The evidence indicated that she conducted a thorough job search, contacted colleagues, hired job-search assistance services, and de - cided to change careers after a lengthy period without success. Cordeau-Chatelain's efforts were reasonable, said the court. The court also decided that TEPCA was on the hook for retraining expenses that Cordeau-Chatelain incurred, because it was the wrongful dismissal that caused those ex - penses. It only subtracted $1,800 from her expense claim because it was for a resumé consultant — a service that was part of the counselling services from TEPCA that she refused. TEPCA was ordered to pay Cordeau- Chatelain a total of $495,081.12 — consist - ing of $326,349 pay in lieu of 18 months' notice; health and insurance benefits over 18 months; pension and savings plan contribu- tions; $49,825.38 in incentive bonuses that she would have earned during the notice pe- riod; and $18,357.12 in retraining expenses. For more information, see: • Cordeau-Chatelain v. Total E&P Canada Ltd., 2021 ABQB 794 (Alta. Q.B.). November 17, 2021 | Canadian Employment Law Today CREDIT: HJBC iSTOCK The worker never reached a top management job, but she achieved the 'top of the middle-management range.'

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Employment Law Today - November 17, 2021