Canadian Safety Reporter

May 2017

Focuses on occupational health and safety issues at a strategic level. Designed for employers, HR managers and OHS professionals, it features news, case studies on best practices and practical tips to ensure the safest possible working environment.

Issue link: https://digital.hrreporter.com/i/807831

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 7 of 7

CSR | May 2017 | News Because he was refusing suit- able work that was available, the WSIB cut off his loss-of-earnings benefits. An appeals resolution officer overturned this decision, finding the work that was avail- able was suitable for Chodha and he was entitled to loss-of-earn- ings benefits up to Nov. 19, 2014 — the date Choda slipped on some ice in a non-work-related accident and exacerbated his in- juries, from which he had almost fully recovered at that point. Chodha received employment insurance benefits until August 2015, after which he found a new job. Note's date a 'mystery' The tribunal examined a copy of the note — the original note was lost and Times Kitchen had a scan of it — and could not find any evidence the date was changed. There was no indication of a whiteout and the date was in the same handwriting as the rest of the note. Due to the chiroprac- tor's statement that he didn't see Chodha on Feb. 6, 2014, the tri- bunal accepted that, but it also found that the note wasn't altered and the reason the note was dated Feb. 6 was "a mystery." The tribunal noted that un- der the Ontario Human Rights Code, the issue was not whether the employer has offered suit- able employment — first deter- mined by the WSIB as yes and then an appeals resolution offi- cer as no — but rather whether the employer has accommo- dated the worker to the point of undue hardship. The tribunal also noted that the code's definition of "disabil- ity" included "an injury or dis- ability for which benefits were claimed or received under the insurance plan established un- der the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997." The tribunal found that Times Kitchen was engaged with the workers' compensation pro- cess until the owner noticed the date on the note. Since it had al- ready found the date on the note hadn't been altered, it accepted that Times Kitchen sincerely believed the date was evidence that the note was fraudulent and Chodha was trying to substanti- ate an absence from work with a note from several months before his employment started. This belief in a fraudulent note was a "non-discriminatory explana- tion for the termination of the employment," the tribunal said. In addition, the tribunal found that Times Kitchen was a small business and Chodha's medical restrictions significant- ly limited the work he could do. It was reasonable to think that there were no modified duties available for Chodha immedi- ately following his injury and it wasn't discriminatory for the owner to tell him so. "The duty to accommodate an injured employee who cannot do his regular duties does not necessarily require an employer to immediately offer alternative work," the tribunal said in dis- missing Chodha's human rights complaint. "The employer is not obliged to offer alternate work if there is no such work or if the employee would not have been working if the injury had not oc- curred because of a shortage of work." For more information see: • Chodha v. 1352866 Ontario Inc., 2016 CarswellOnt 21283 (Ont. Human Rights Trib.). Injured < pg. 5 Employer sincerely believed note was false WEBINARS Interested in learning more about safety and HR issues directly from the experts? Check out the Carswell Professional Development Centre's live and on-demand webinars discussing topics such as Ontario's sexual violence and harassment plan act, chemicals in the workplace, and fall protection. Visit www.cpdcentre.ca/cos for more information. ©2017 Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd ISBN/ISSN: 978-0-7798-2810-4 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the written permission of the publisher (Thomson Reuters, Media Solutions, Canada). Canadian Safety Reporter is part of the Canadian HR Reporter group of publications: • Canadian HR Reporter — www.hrreporter.com • Canadian Occupational Safety magazine — www.cos-mag.com • Canadian Payroll Reporter — www.payroll-reporter.com • Canadian Employment Law Today — www.employmentlawtoday.com • Canadian Labour Reporter — www.labour-reporter.com See carswell.com for information Safety Reporter Canadian www.safety-reporter.com Published 12 times a year by Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd. Subscription rate: $129 per year Customer Service Tel: (416) 609-3800 (Toronto) (800) 387-5164 (outside Toronto) Fax: (416) 298-5106 E-mail: customersupport.legaltaxcanada@tr.com Website: www.carswell.com One Corporate Plaza 2075 Kennedy Road Toronto, Ontario, Canada M1T 3V4 Director, Media Solutions, Canada Karen Lorimer Publisher/Managing Editor Todd Humber Lead Editor Jeffrey R. Smith Assistant Editor Mallory Hendry Marketing & Audience Development Manager Robert Symes rob.symes@thomsonreuters.com (416) 649-9551 Circulation Co-ordinator Keith Fulford keith.fulford@thomsonreuters.com (416) 649-9585 Sales Manager Paul Burton paul.burton@thomsonreuters.com (416) 649-9928

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Safety Reporter - May 2017