Canadian HR Reporter

December 2018 CAN

Canadian HR Reporter is the national journal of human resource management. It features the latest workplace news, HR best practices, employment law commentary and tools and tips for employers to get the most out of their workforce.

Issue link: https://digital.hrreporter.com/i/1055204

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 27 of 31

CANADIAN HR REPORTER DECEMBER 2018 28 FEATURES OUTPLACEMENT 4 KPIs to gauge outplacement success Last impressions provide opportunity to improve, manage employer brand By Laurie Compartino A s the labour market in Canada continues to tighten, much attention is being paid to first impressions, such as candidate experience and employee onboarding. But employers should also be looking at what happens when an employee must exit the organiza- tion. And outplacement programs are a tool that can help manage these "last impressions." Ninety-three per cent of Cana- dian HR managers agree that out- placement support is valuable, yet only about half of employers offer it, according to a 2018 RiseSmart survey of 1,000 workers and 253 HR professionals. is may be a missed opportu- nity for leadership teams, as many agree that a strong employer brand is critical. Outplacement can be a signifi- cant investment, yet outdated of- ferings give little in the way of data to determine the true impact and return on investment. Old-style outplacement still re- lies on manual processes, spread- sheets and raw data. is requires the HR team to spend time pick- ing out what key performance in- dicators (KPIs) they can find. From there, the data is often filed and forgotten, and there is very little information about how terminated employees used these services. Need for data It's no secret that most HR teams are running leaner than ever be- fore. e need for constant analy- sis of workforce metrics means HR runs on granular data. By leveraging new outplace- ment technology, HR can bring manual, unmeasured programs into a modern way of working. Properly measured, outplace- ment will produce a great deal of data; and there are four key indi- cators for assessing the effective- ness of outplacement programs: Engagement: Engagement is the metric that signals whether terminated employees are signing up for the outplacement offering. Low engagement may indicate a communication problem or an ac- cessibility issue. Nearly one-fifth (18 per cent) of employees don't know if their employer offers outplacement, according to a 2018 RiseSmart survey of more than 1,000 work- ers in the U.S. and Canada who had been affected by a layoff, and 27 per cent of exiting employees don't use it, either because they didn't know about or didn't un- derstand the offering. Real-time engagement data is key to ensuring former employees are supported and set up to suc- ceed in their job search. Utilization: Utilization is about measuring which employ- ees are taking advantage of the various offerings, such as webi- nars, resumé services, coaching and job leads. ese metrics help HR teams assess the overall value of the program by understanding which services work best in their indus- try for their types of workers. is allows them to fine-tune the offering and assess any gaps in how the outplacement benefit is communicated before and dur- ing a restructuring. Landing rate: Understanding how long employees take to find a new job is also critical. is indicator is called the land- ing rate and is an effective real- time metric for the overall efficacy of the program. Some companies share this data with managers as a transparent way to bolster morale among remaining employees. A good landing rate benefits the employer brand, too. Employees who land quickly are more likely to feel positively about the com- pany and to post good reviews on social media, or sites such as Glassdoor. In terms of evaluat- ing the overall effectiveness of the outplacement vendor, the landing rate is important. Satisfaction: Satisfaction mea- sures the overall satisfaction of past employees, and it's a key in- dicator of employer brand health. Most human resources teams work with qualitative feedback, such as reputation, and quanti- tative feedback, such as net pro- moter score, opportunity to re- employ and online ratings. Understanding satisfaction and sentiment is important for ongo- ing recruiting — companies with a poor reputation pay a premium of 10 per cent more per hire, accord- ing to a 2016 survey of 1,003 U.S. workers by the Harvard Business Review. Real-time means real impact When HR can see how terminat- ed employees are working with the program, they can make better decisions to drive future engage- ment and utilization. Immediate insights into how quickly employees land can be used as a benchmark to assess how tight the labour market is, as well as where there might be remaining at-risk roles within the company. The real-time ability to as- sess the overall efficacy of the outplacement program allows for necessary adjustments, and demonstrates the return on in- vestment in terms of results, em- ployer brand and willingness to recommend. For example, 82 per cent of for- mer employees whose companies offer outplacement feel their exit process was managed well, versus 39 per cent where no outplace- ment was offered, according to the North American RiseSmart survey. This translates into positive sentiment, which impacts repu- tation, employee engagement and employer brand. In fact, 59 per cent of out- placement-supported employ- ees have a positive sentiment about the company versus just 35 per cent among who didn't get outplacement. Almost all (92 per cent) of the people who receive outplacement support feel it is valuable, and 73 per cent say they would return to the same employer in the future, found the survey. Plus, 65 per cent of employees say they would apply for a role at a company that offered outplace- ment services, according to the RiseSmart survey of Canadian workers. An outplacement partner can also offer valuable support to HR during a restructuring, letting them focus on the most impor- tant tasks. Finding a modern outplace- ment partner begins with asking a variety of questions about the technology. For example: How quickly will aggregated and individual par- ticipation data be available? Will there be real-time alerts if a pro- gram KPI is not being met? Can the HR team access a real-time dashboard? Vendors should also offer fully mobile-enabled access to data, along with comprehensive reports and predictive analytics. Laurie Compartino is general man- ager at RiseSmart Canada in Mon- treal. For more information, visit www.risesmart.com. Credit: NaNae (Shutterstock)

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian HR Reporter - December 2018 CAN