Canadian Employment Law Today

February 10, 2021

Focuses on human resources law from a business perspective, featuring news and cases from the courts, in-depth articles on legal trends and insights from top employment lawyers across Canada.

Issue link: https://digital.hrreporter.com/i/1337809

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 4 of 7

Canadian HR Reporter, 2021 Canaan grew in size, employing more than 50 employees and then discontinued its business, or else had a payroll more than $2.5 million, Rutledge would be entitled to severance pay, irrespective of his job de - scription," said the court. "The employment contract clearly disentitles Rutledge to these employment standards." The court concluded that even a potential violation of the ESA should be unenforce - able, even if the change of that violation is remote. In this case, the termination provi- sions in Rutledge's employment contract "purported to contract out of the ESA in at least two ways," said the court. Bottom line for employers Rutledge v. Canaan reminds employers that they certainly have a threshold to meet when drafting termination provisions in employ- ment agreements. Even if an employment standard does not currently apply to an em- ployee, an employer must consider even a remote possibility of the ESA employment standard potentially applying in the future. Accordingly, when drafting termination clauses in employment agreements, employ - ers should consider current circumstances as well as hypothetical future circumstances. A termination provision that purports to deny an employee rights under employment stan- dards legislation to which they might po- tentially be entitled in the future will raise issues of enforceability if challenged. We will have to see if subsequent deci- sions support the notion that the degree of remoteness of a potential ESA violation does not matter. Regardless, employment contracts should be updated on a regular basis because the law of termination clause compliance is constantly evolving. For more information, see: • Rutledge v. Canaan Construction Inc., 2020 ONSC 4246 (Ont. S.C.J.). February 10, 2021 | Canadian Employment Law Today CREDIT: OLIVIER LE MOAL iSTOCK ABOUT THE AUTHORS Rhonda B. Levy is knowledge management counsel for Littler LLP in Canada, monitoring legislative, regulatory and case law developments. She can be reached at (647) 256-4545 or rlevy@littler.com. George Vassos is a partner with Littler LLP in Toronto, practising on a wide variety of labour and employment law issues. He can be reached at (647) 256-4504 or gvassos@littler.com.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Employment Law Today - February 10, 2021