Canadian Employment Law Today

September 8, 2021

Focuses on human resources law from a business perspective, featuring news and cases from the courts, in-depth articles on legal trends and insights from top employment lawyers across Canada.

Issue link: https://digital.hrreporter.com/i/1406315

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 4 of 7

Canadian HR Reporter, 2021 The court held differently with respect to Imperial Oil's alcohol testing policy. Breatha- lyzer testing for alcohol was a reliable indica- tor of current impairment. In the context of Imperial Oil's highly safety-sensitive environ- ment where supervision was limited or non- existent, random alcohol testing was reason- ably necessary — but only to the extent that individual accommodation of employees who test positive was available. This included the consideration of remedial sanctions less severe than dismissal. As a result of Entrop, pre-employment drug testing and random drug testing is consid - ered discriminatory and is simply not the best or only answer to discourage use and impairment at work. Practical considerations Employers seeking to mitigate the risk of can- nabis impairment and legal challenges to its policies may look to the following measures: • Prohibiting use during work hours. Employers, however, should avoid zero- tolerance approaches to respect accom- modation obligations. • Requiring disclosure. Anyone claiming a medical need for cannabis during working hours is obliged to disclose it. • Implement testing alternatives. With training, objective observation tools may be equally effective as effective. Educat - ing employees about the risks associated with cannabis use will also help mitigate use within and outside of the workplace. Cannabis use is yet another aspect of em- ployee conduct that an employer must seek to manage. Testing, however, is simply not the best answer to deter use, unless it is part and parcel of a post-accident investigation process. Training, education and monitoring are much better tools to control legitimate cannabis-related safety concerns. For more information, see: • Aitchison v. L & L Painting and Decorating Ltd., 2018 HRTO 238 (Ont. Human Rights Trib.). • Airport Terminal Services Canadian Company v. UNIFOR, Local 2002, 2018 CanLII 34078 (Can. Arb.). • Entrop v. Imperial Oil, 2000 CanLII 16800 (Ont. C.A.). • Health reports: What has changed since can - nabis was legalized? (Feb. 19, 2020), Statistics Canada, https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/ daily-quotidien/200219/dq200219c-eng.htm • Ontario Human Rights Commission's Policy on Drug and alcohol testing, http:// www.ohrc.on.ca/en/policy-drug-and-alcohol- testing-2016 September 8, 2021 | Canadian Employment Law Today CREDIT: RAPIDEYE iSTOCK Training, education, and monitoring are good tools to control cannabis-related safety concerns. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Rishi Bandhu Rishi Bandhu is an employment lawyer in Oakville, Ont., advising employers and employees on all aspects of employment and labour law. He can be reached at (905) 849-0025 or rishi@blpc.ca.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Employment Law Today - September 8, 2021