Canadian Employment Law Today

September 17, 2014

Focuses on human resources law from a business perspective, featuring news and cases from the courts, in-depth articles on legal trends and insights from top employment lawyers across Canada.

Issue link: https://digital.hrreporter.com/i/407893

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 4 of 7

Canadian HR Reporter, a Thomson Reuters business 2014 September 17, 2014 | Canadian Employment Law Today employment law blog Canadian Employment Law Today invites you to check out its employment law blog, where editor Jeffrey R. Smith discusses recent cases and developments in employment law. The blog includes a tool for readers to offer their comments, so discussion is welcome and encouraged. The blog features topics such as family status accommodation, workplace violence, wrongful dismissal, and cutting staff. You can view the blog at www.employmentlawtoday.com. at the host company related to the area of expertise. • e specialized knowledge will not be readily available within the Canadian la- bour market, and cannot be readily trans- ferred to another individual. It must be noted that, where a treaty such as the NAFTA, Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement, or Canada-Peru Free Trade Agreement provides a different definition of Specialized Knowledge, that definition will still apply. Introduction of mandatory wage floor A completely new element in the Special- ized Knowledge category has been intro- duced. e policy now requires that the employee claiming to possess Specialized Knowledge be remunerated at a level com- mensurate with the position. In order to introduce some objectivity to the definition of a mandatory wage floor, the new criteria requires that the foreign worker should re- ceive, as a minimum, the prevailing wage for the specific occupation and region of work as listed in the Employment and Skills De- velopment Canada "Working in Canada" website tool to determine prevailing Cana- dian Wage. e tool can be found at http:// www.jobbank.gc.ca/wage-outlook_search- eng.do?reportOption=wage. While the authorities have been using wage levels as an indication of specializa- tion for some time, this is the first attempt to codify its use. Non-cash payments such as hotel, trans- portation, and other benefits cannot be tak- en into consideration when evaluating the prevailing wage. Only allowances compen- sated in monetary form and paid directly to the employee can be included. e mandatory wage policy does not ap- ply to Specialized Knowledge workers en- tering Canada pursuant to the NAFTA or to other international free trade agreements. Nevertheless, officers must still consider wages as an indicator of specialization in their overall assessment. ese important changes restrict the use of the Intra-Company Transferee Special- ized Knowledge category and make it more difficult for employers to transfer technical personnel involved in Canadian projects. Changes to the Temporary Foreign Work- er Program are ongoing and it is expected further restrictions may be introduced in the future. Given the evolving nature of the program, employers are encouraged to keep abreast of developments and follow specific cases to ensure applications are made based on current and timely analysis of existing policies and programs. About the Author SERGIO R. KARAS Principal of Karas Immigration Law Professional Corpora- tion, is a Certified Specialist in Canadian Citizenship and Immigration Law by the Law Society of Upper Canada. He is Past Chair of the Ontario Bar Association Citizenship and Immigration Section, Past Chair of the International Bar Association Immigration and Nationality Committee, and Editor of the Global Business Immigration Handbook, published by Carswell. He can be reached at (416) 506- 1800 or karas@karas.ca. CRedit: alexSkopJe

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Employment Law Today - September 17, 2014