Canadian Employment Law Today

November 12, 2014

Focuses on human resources law from a business perspective, featuring news and cases from the courts, in-depth articles on legal trends and insights from top employment lawyers across Canada.

Issue link: https://digital.hrreporter.com/i/417189

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 2 of 11

Canadian Employment Law Today | 3 Canadian HR Reporter, a Thomson Reuters business 2014 Cases and Trends Mental distress compensation awarded by Ontario tribunal Standard restricting workers compensation for mental stress to that caused by sudden and unexpected events discriminatory By RoNaLd MiNkEN The liMiTs On chronic mental stress claims in the Ontario Workplace Safety In- surance Act (WSIA) are contrary to the Ca- nadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Ontario Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal has ruled. e tribunal refused to uphold the legislation's limits on mental health claims, allowing workers with mental stress claims not based on sudden, traumatic and unexpected events to receive compensation under the WSIA. e claimant worker was a nurse at a hos- pital who was mistreated by a physician for 12 years. e physician yelled at the nurse and made demeaning comments about her in front of both colleagues and patients. However, there was no physical mistreat- ment. Even though the nurse and co-work- ers complained about the physician's be- havior to management, no action was taken against the physician. Instead, management advised the nurse that her duties would be reduced, though her job title and classifica- tion would not change. e nurse claimed workplace stressors led to her diagnosis of adjustment disorder with mixed features of anxiety and depression. e nurse brought an application for damages due to mental stress to the Ontario Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB), but her application was denied. She appealed, alleging that the mental stress provisions in the WSIA violated her section 15 equality rights under the charter. Workers compensation To be eligible for compensation through the WSIA, claimants only need to show they fall under the provision of the WSIA. Unlike civil claims, compensation is not based on fault; there is no need to show the employer was negligent. As all employers contribute to the compensation scheme, workers also do not have to worry their claims will not be paid out. However, in exchange for these benefits, workers whose claims fall under the WSIA are precluded from suing their employer in civil court. e current WSIA legislation and associ- ated policy manual differentiates between wsia on page 9 ยป

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Employment Law Today - November 12, 2014