Canadian Employment Law Today

January 21, 2015

Focuses on human resources law from a business perspective, featuring news and cases from the courts, in-depth articles on legal trends and insights from top employment lawyers across Canada.

Issue link: https://digital.hrreporter.com/i/446804

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 3 of 7

4 Canadian HR Reporter, a Thomson Reuters business 2015 Employee sent packing after pre-planned trip while off sick Worker made trip arrangements after using up his vacation time, then asked his doctor for note giving him time off for stress during trip dates By JEffrEy r. SmiTh T he City of Toronto had just cause to dismiss an employee for mis- using sick leave so he could leave the country for two weeks, an arbitra- tor has ruled. Frank Covelli was a custodian at a recre- ation centre run by the City of Toronto. He was usually the only custodian on duty when he worked and had 21 years of service with no discipline on his record. Covelli had a medical history of anxiety and stress, which manifested in insomnia and migraine headaches and for which he took medication. He also had a relationship with a woman who lived in the Dominican Republic, which ended when he travelled there in April 2010. At the same time, he began a relationship with another woman in that country who he began to call his fi- ancée a month later. Covelli tried to help his fiancée come to Canada by sponsoring her visa application. He discussed his trip to the Dominican Re- public with a co-worker in May 2010 and said he was planning to return there in the fall. When the co-worker asked Covelli if he had any vacation credits left, Covelli said he didn't and shrugged his shoulders. His April trip had used the last of his vacation time for the year. On July 24, a friend of Covelli who also worked for the city bought airline tickets for himself and Covelli to take a trip to the Dominican Republic, leaving on Sept. 10. A couple of weeks later, Covelli saw his family doctor for anxiety symptoms and said he may need time off work in September due to per- sonal issues. ree weeks later, on Aug. 25, Covelli had another doctor's appointment in which he told his doctor his personal issues were related to his fiancée in the Dominican and they were causing him stress. He asked the doctor for a medical note indicating he couldn't work from Sept. 10 to Sept. 24 due to medical reasons. e doctor gave him the note, but indicated that he hoped Covelli would not have to go out of town. On Sept. 10, Covelli was scheduled to work but called another employee to say he was booking off sick. Covelli then left a message on the maintenance line to be for- warded to the on-call supervisor saying he had a medical condition, his absence was on doctor's orders and he would be off sick un- til Sept. 25. However, proper procedure was to call the supervisor directly. Later that day, the supervisor tried to call Covelli but was unsuccessful. He also failed to reach him over the next few days, so on Sept. 14 he and the facilities supervisor went to Covelli's home but there was no answer. A friend of Covelli's later called to inquire how things were going without Covelli. Employee left the country while off sick As it turned out, Covelli travelled to the Dominican Republic on Sept. 10, the day he called in sick. Covelli called the supervisor back on a cell- phone and he was asked why he wasn't home and why his friend had called. Covelli became upset and said he felt harassed, but agreed to have a friend drop off a doctor's note at management's request. Covelli called back later and the supervisor told him he would send someone to pick up the doctor's note at Covelli's home, but Covelli becam upset again and suggested he was being harassed. Covelli became angry and swore at the su- pervisor before the conversation ended. Later that day, the supervisor contacted Covelli on his cellphone and asked again where he was. Covelli still refused to answer and the supervisor told him the city had reason to believe he was in the Dominican Republic. Covelli asked why he would say that but didn't confirm it. He then arranged for a doctor's note to be dropped off. Covelli returned to work on Sept. 25, but was 20 minutes late for his shift. He was sus- pended indefinitely and a meeting was called for two days later. At the meeting, Covelli agreed he had been out of the country but said he was off work due to a medical condi- tion and he had been stressed out because of his fiancée. Covelli felt he had the right to leave the country while on sick leave because his symptoms were related to the issues he had to address in the Dominican Republic. Covelli initially didn't respond when asked if he had seen his doctor on Sept. 10 to obtain the sick note, but then said he had. He apologized for making a mistake and maintained it didn't matter where he went while on sick leave. Covelli refused to answer when asked when he purchased his airline ticket. A second meeting was held and man- agement asked Covelli about the accuracy of his attendance log book. After Covelli was late on Sept. 25, the city looked into the records of when the alarm at the rec- reation centre was turned on and off and compared it to the log book, where Covelli was required to record any discrepancies between his scheduled shift and his actual arrival and departure. e investigation re- vealed discrepancies between June 1 and Sept. 7, 2010, that totaled almost 28 hours. Covelli said he made appropriate notes and everyone at the centre was late "once in a while." When one particular day when he left six hours before the end of his shift was brought up, Covelli said he had been given permission by a supervisor. CASE In PoInT: JUST CAUSE EMPLOYEES generally are allowed a certain number of days they can take off work due to illness, whether these days are paid or unpaid. Though it may seem inconvenient, sick leave can benefit employers as well as employees, as an employee who comes to work sick can have ramifications for the workplace. However, there is often a concern that some employees might be abusing their sick leave entitlement and are actually playing "hookey" from work. Many employers have attendance management programs to monitor employees who may be taking too many sick days and are suspected of abusing this privilege — which can cost employers money and productivity, not to mention the effort involved in covering for absences. If an employee is found to be lying about being sick — especially to the extent of manipulating a doctor to get the right note — the dishonesty it entails and the trouble it causes for the employer could be sufficient enough to provide cause for dismissal. BACKGROUND

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Employment Law Today - January 21, 2015