Focuses on human resources law from a business perspective, featuring news and cases from the courts, in-depth articles on legal trends and insights from top employment lawyers across Canada.
Issue link: https://digital.hrreporter.com/i/545324
4 Canadian HR Reporter, a Thomson Reuters business 2015 Bus driver fired after punishing rowdy passengers Driver claimed he was set up by passenger's false injury report but failed to accept responsibility for failing to follow procedure after sudden emergency stop BY JEFFREY R. SMITH A British Columbia transit provid- er had just cause to dismiss a bus driver who didn't drive safely when he became angry with rowdy pas- sengers, an arbitrator has ruled. Tim Welsman was a bus driver for Whistler Transit, a transit provider in the town of Whistler, B.C. Hired in 2001, he worked the late-night shift in which he often had passengers coming out of bars who were intoxicated and boisterous. Welsman had two disciplinary suspensions on his record, for three and five days respectively, for sleeping in after unsuccessfully trying to change his shift to the day. He considered himself a good driver, though he had demerit points from a 2009 incident where a police vehicle pulled him over after he thought it was pulling over someone else. He felt the officer had set him up and shouldn't have charged him with speeding or following too closely. Welsman had also bumped a car illegally parked at a bus stop in December 2009, though he didn't know until he saw a smudge mark on the bus at the next stop. He was charged with driving without reasonable consideration for other persons using the highway, which Welsman felt was unfair and "a bit extreme." In July 2011, Welsman was charged with speeding in his own vehicle and his license was suspended for one month. Whistler Transit gave him a two-month leave of absence and upon his return he was subject to a three-month probationary period in return for his promise to follow all employer policies and procedures. Rowdy passengers on late-night run Welsman was driving his bus route at 2:40 a.m. on Nov. 14, 2014, making his last run before returning to the transit centre. He had an empty bus until he arrived at a stop where several bars had just closed. One passenger tried to distract him while others got onboard the bus without pay- ing, Many of them were intoxicated and acting rambunctious, going to the back of the bus. Welsman couldn't see all the way to the back because there were some passengers standing in the aisle. ree male passengers were near the front of the bus and one pressed the stop button as soon as the bus left, while the other two started hanging and swinging from the overhead railings. Welsman stopped the bus at the next stop, but no one got off. When he pulled away, the same passenger pressed the stop button again but failed to get off at the next stop. Some of the other passengers yelled at Welsman to get the bus moving. As Welsman pulled away from the second stop, someone pushed the stop button again. Welsman was becoming annoyed with this as well as the comments from other passengers. At the next stop, he got off the bus to smoke a cigarette and cool off. Some of the passengers said they were annoyed he was taking a break. At the next stop, several passengers got off and the two who had been swinging on the railings used the extra space to do it even more. Welsman could now see to the back of the bus and, when he saw passengers preparing to hang from the hand straps, he made an emergency stop. Several passengers were thrown around and some out of their seats. Welsman turned and announced to the bus, "Sit down and hold on. e first two rules of bus riding." He saw one passenger getting up from his hands and knees and several passengers started yelling at him. A few came up to him expressed their displeasure face-to-face. ough it was Whistler Transit policy for a driver to walk through a bus after an emergency stop to check for any passenger injuries, Welsman instead did a visual inspection from his seat and didn't see anyone hurt, nor did anyone inform him of any injuries. e passenger who was on the floor came forward and told him he wasn't hurt, so Welsman continued on the route, with some passengers angry and making derisive comments. e group of passengers who were causing the most trouble eventually got off at a stop, making threats, swearing, and spitting at the bus. Welsman felt threatened, but two passengers — including the one who had fallen — shielded him. Welsman completed his run, returned to the transit centre, inspected the bus, and went home without filing an incident report since he felt there were no injuries and it was a typical night of drunken revelers. Later that morning, a passenger from Welsman's bus showed up at the transit centre to inquire about his cellphone, which he thought he had lost on the bus. He spoke to a dispatcher and told her Welsman had slammed on the brakes during the ride, sending many passengers sprawling. He said someone landed on his leg and another passenger was momentarily unconscious. After he got off the bus, he felt pain in his knee and had no strength in it. He went to the hospital and was diagnosed with a torn medial collateral ligament. Driver denied anyone was injured after emergency stop e service delivery manager was told of the passenger's report and called Wels- man to complete an incident report. Welsman faxed a report that said people were hanging upside down, spitting, and swearing on the bus, so he performed an emergency stop. Welsman said people lurched forward and he told them the rule for bus riding safety was to sit down and hold on. Welsman also said in his report that three passengers approached him in an aggressive way but two other passengers blocked them. He concluded CASE IN POINT: JUST CAUSE EMPLOYEES who interact with the general public as part of their jobs can face difficulties at times, as it's almost inevitable they will encounter someone who isn't easy to deal with. In such circumstances, it can be hard for the employee to proceed without reacting negatively. However, employees in such positions usually face a higher level of expectation to do their job and closely follow employer policies and procedures, as they are entrusted by the employer to act professionally and project a good image of the employer. And this expectation goes even higher if the employee's position involves customer safety, such as a bus driver. BACKGROUND