Canadian Employment Law Today

September 28, 2016

Focuses on human resources law from a business perspective, featuring news and cases from the courts, in-depth articles on legal trends and insights from top employment lawyers across Canada.

Issue link: https://digital.hrreporter.com/i/724746

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 4 of 7

contained a reviewable error because it did not address the evidence presented by the employer in a manner that was transpar- ent, intelligible and reasonable. Specifically, the officer neglected to consider the further clarification of the advertising process pro- vided by the employer, which was raised during the telephone discussions between the officer and the employer and later also in writing. e employer presented evidence that at least one of the advertisements con - tinued to be available and indicated that to the officer, and it was not for the court to decide its weight. e reviewable error was the absence of any analysis of that evidence to support the conclusion that the efforts made by the employer were not sufficient. Having found that the officer's decision should be quashed on the basis of the adver - tising issue, the court declined to consider the portion of the LMIA refusal dealing with the prevailing wage discrepancy. e matter was remitted back to the TFWP for a deci - sion by a different officer. e advertising guidelines and the inter- pretation of reasonable efforts to hire Ca- nadians to be made by an employer seeking to employ a temporary foreign worker have been fraught with inconsistencies in in- terpretation by officers across Canada and a wide variety of opinions, even between officers in the same geographic location. e decision in this case should give some comfort to employers and strengthen their position as to what constitute reasonable ef - forts to hire Canadians. However, it would be preferable for employers to insist that the guidelines be revised, made clear, rea- sonable, and transparent to avoid further litigation. For more information see: • Charger Logistics Ltd. v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Social Development), 2016 CarswellNat 593 (F.C.). • Frankie's Burgers Lougheed Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Social Devel - opment), 2015 CarswellNat 107 (F.C.). • Canadian Reformed Church of Cloverdale B.C. v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Social Development), 2015 CarswellNat 4453 (F.C.). . Canadian HR Reporter, a Thomson Reuters business 2016 September 28, 2016 | Canadian Employment Law Today ABOUT THE AUTHOR Sergio R. Karas Sergio R. Karas, principal of Karas Immigration Law Professional Corporation, is a Certified Specialist in Canadian Citizenship and Immigration Law by the Law Society of Upper Canada. He is Co-Chair of the ABA Canada Committee, Section of International Law, Past Chair of the Ontario Bar Association Citizenship and Immigration Section, Past Chair of the International Bar Association Immigration and Nationality Committee, and Editor of the Global Business Immigration Handbook. He can be reached at (416) 506-1800 or karas@karas.ca. CREDIT: MAXX-STUDIO/SHUTTERSTOCK

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Employment Law Today - September 28, 2016