Canadian Labour Reporter

September 19, 2016

Canadian Labour Reporter is the trusted source of information for labour relations professionals. Published weekly, it features news, details on collective agreements and arbitration summaries to help you stay on top of the changing landscape.

Issue link: https://digital.hrreporter.com/i/726837

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 6 of 7

terminating Storey for cause, the case would have fallen apart be- cause management ignored the sunset clause — which stated dis- cipline would only be held on re- cord for two years. Background On June 18, 2014, Storey arrived late for her shift and one of the residents complained about her intoxication. A co-worker told a nurse Storey reeked of alcohol and the nurse called Lesley Larrea, the director of care, at home. Larrea then drove to the nursing home and spoke with Storey. Larrea said Storey smelled of alcohol, looked tired, avoided eye contact, had slurred speech and relied on hand carts and a hand- rail while walking. Larrea sent her home in a cab. The next day, Larrea called Storey in for a meeting to discuss the incident along with a union representative. Larrea apologized and claimed she had only one drink before work and had taken half a sleeping pill 12 hours prior to the shift. Larrea didn't believe her and thought the mismatched facts be- ing presented amounted to gross misconduct. She read Storey a prepared termination letter, citing the fact she denied being intoxi- cated and that working under the influence of drugs or alcohol was a serious safety issue. Interestingly, Larrea had also prepared a second letter — which outlined an unpaid suspension that required Storey to enrol in a treatment program and the ac- commodation that would be of- fered on her return to work. This was contingent on Storey offering an explanation — essen- tially admitting she had an addic- tion problem. Because she didn't make such an admission, Larrea fired her. Employee had history of incidents During the meeting, Larrea brought up similar situations that happened in the past — includ- ing instances from 2007, 2008 and 2010. There was no question Sto- rey had some issues in the past. Her previous partner slashed her throat with a knife and she had to have surgery on her vocal chords. The brutal attack left her suffer- ing from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In December 2007, Storey wasn't coping well and turned to drinking alcohol as a crutch. A let- ter that month from her employer discussed an incident where she showed up late with a slurred voice, glazed eyes and breath that smelled of alcohol. A 2008 letter outlined how she had been late to work and upon arrival was "disoriented, sluggish and glassy-eyed." In February 2010, an employer letter stated Storey "arrived at work smelling of alcohol, (with a) stag- gering gait, speech slurred and eyes glazed." She was suspended for three days and required to attend a treatment program for alcohol ad- diction. Storey attended a 28-day in- house program at the Metis Ad- dictions Council of Saskatchewan as an outpatient in 2010 and an in- patient in 2011. Despite this, Larrea testified that though she knew of "similar- type situations" from Storey's past, she was unaware she had an alcohol addiction or had a medi- cal health issue resulting from ad- diction. Two days before she showed up to work drunk, Storey told Larrea she was seeing a counsellor who recommended she take some time off — but she didn't formally re- quest it. She felt it wouldn't have been granted because the nursing home was short-staffed. Arbitration At arbitration, the employer ar- gued there was no expert medical evidence that Storey had an addic- tion to alcohol. She denied being intoxicated when at work, or the following day, but later admitted she was drunk. She was dishonest, and it had no duty to accommo- date an "alleged disability," it said. Even if there was a medical disability, the employer argued termination was not excessive as there had been a complete loss of trust and the employment rela- tionship was no longer viable. The arbitrators disagreed on all almost all points. Not disciplining a health-care worker who showed up late and intoxicated would be a "rare cir- cumstance indeed," they wrote. But in finding Storey's conduct non-culpable and undeserving of any discipline, that's exactly what the arbitration board did. It found ample evidence of an alcohol addiction and even though Larrea wasn't involved with the employer's letters in 2007 to 2010, it was "inconceivable that she did not know (Storey) was addicted to alco- hol and had a disability." The arbitrators found it ironic that Larrea was aware of the previ- ous incidents because the employ- er breached the sunset clause that should have expunged the 2007- 2010 events from Storey's files. "The notes from the investiga- tion meetings and the termina- tion letter plainly reveal the in- fluence of the aged records and discipline regarding intoxication, which had an alcohol problem at its core," wrote the board. It chastised the employer for not delivering the second disci- pline letter — which called for an unpaid suspension and for her to enter a treatment program. "What makes us shake our heads is that Ms. Larrea knew (Storey) was intoxicated (or, at a minimum, under the influence of alcohol) on June 18, and (Storey's) denial was implausible. What more would a reasonable employer need to trig- ger the accommodation set out in the letter that was not delivered?" The employer shouldn't have waited for an official time off re- quest. Broaching the subject with her employer was a "cry for help that fell on deaf ears." Had more empathy been shown, given the worker's history, the June 18 inci- dent could have been avoided. The board also took the em- ployer to task for accommodating Storey in the past when she was a more junior employee, but turning immediately to termination for a similar offence when she had more seniority. It ordered Storey reinstated with full back pay, seniority and benefits. The only condition at- tached was for her to attend an accredited treatment program "to the extent reasonably determined to be necessary from time to time." For more information see: • Prince Albert Parkland Health Region and CUPE, Local 4777 (Storey), Re, 2016 CarswellSask 473 (Sask. Arb.). 7 Canadian HR Reporter, a Thomson Reuters business 2016 CANADIAN LABOUR REPORTER NEWS < Intoxicated pg. 1 Domestic abuse troubles forced worker to turn to alcohol Photo: AndreyCherkasov (Shutterstock)

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Labour Reporter - September 19, 2016