Canadian Employment Law Today

November 22, 2017

Focuses on human resources law from a business perspective, featuring news and cases from the courts, in-depth articles on legal trends and insights from top employment lawyers across Canada.

Issue link: https://digital.hrreporter.com/i/899617

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 4 of 7

may not be grounds for action. In fact, in many workplaces, differing views are regularly exchanged in a respect- ful manner. It could be a part of the busi- ness culture, or simple water-cooler talk. In that case, employers should distinguish between acceptable and lawful "shop talk" and where there is a risk of conduct devolv- ing into unacceptable conduct that could be found to be in violation of the law or workplace policies. To the extent that activism ends up becoming bullying, harassment, or be- haviour that could spark conflict in the workplace, potentially disrupting the employer's productivity or workplace cul- ture, it could set the stage for discipline. In some cases, the employer may simply want to remain neutral and not have any specific viewpoint connected to its brand. at's why it's so important to have poli- cies outlining how views or values should be communicated across and outside the organization and, perhaps, the spe- cific reputational interests that could be harmed by inappropriate behaviour. Rank in organization a factor Another important point to note is that an employer's level of tolerance for a staff member's protest or expression of politi- cal views is often linked to that individual's rank and role in the company. If an em- ployee is the "face of the franchise" a la star quarterback Kaepernick — or, in a corpo- rate context, a top executive or salesper- son, for example — an organization would have a far easier time arguing a negative brand or reputational impact if that em- ployee's actions can be even indirectly tied to the business. No matter the context, employers should still deal with the matter delicately if an em- ployee decides to "take a knee" and make a political, cultural or social statement. But they also need to remember their rights and consider the potential harm- ful consequences if that opinion becomes inextricably linked to their brand. It's a dif- ficult balancing act that's only made more complicated in the social media era when every employee has a platform to express his beliefs. Canadian HR Reporter, a Thomson Reuters business 2017 November 22, 2017 | Canadian Employment Law Today ABOUT THE AUTHOR LAURA WILLIAMS Laura Williams is the founder and principal of Williams HR Law, a human resources law firm in Markham, Ont., serving employers exclusively. She can be reached at (905) 205-0496 or lwilliams@williamshrlaw.com. CREDIT: EDUARDO MUNOZ/REUTERS

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Employment Law Today - November 22, 2017