Canadian HR Reporter

January 2018 CAN

Canadian HR Reporter is the national journal of human resource management. It features the latest workplace news, HR best practices, employment law commentary and tools and tips for employers to get the most out of their workforce.

Issue link: https://digital.hrreporter.com/i/917946

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 1 of 19

CANADIAN HR REPORTER JANUARY 2018 2 NEWS Finding middle ground for Canada's pension plans Panel debates pros and cons of Bill C-27 and target benefit plans BY MARCEL VANDER WIER WITH Canadian employers continuing to shift away from de- fined benefit (DB) pension plans, Bill C-27, An Act to Amend the Pension Benefits Standards Act, is looking to establish a framework for target benefit pensions in the federal private sector and Crown corporations. If put into law, the bill would allow banks, airlines and telecom- munication companies to establish target benefit plans, as well as per- mit the conversion of DB plans to the target benefit option. e world of pensions is shift- ing and needs to be addressed, said Lynn Hemmings, senior chief of the financial sector policy branch of the Department of Finance Canada. With a continual shift from DB plans to defined contribution (DC) options, the federal government cannot simply leave options as they are, she said. "I'm not sure that's the outcome that we want," said Hemmings, speaking at a pension conference by Lancaster House in Toronto in November. e bill comes into play at a time when interest rates are experienc- ing an extended low, alongside market volatility and increased life expectancies for workers — all of which threaten the sustainability of DB plans, said Hemmings. "e drivers for this are really around the sustainability challeng- es that have arisen since 2009." e objective of the target ben- efit framework is to provide a life- time pension that pools market risk and protects retirees against the risk of outliving savings, she said. It promotes plan sustainabil- ity by allowing benefits and contri- butions to be adjusted in response to the plan's funded status. Any benefit conversion requires potential risk and rewards to be clearly communicated, followed by individual informed consent, she said. "People will not be with a gun held to their head," said Hem- mings, noting that the bill is a broad stroke. "If we start creating carve-outs, we could be undermining the balance that currently exists be- tween the rights of employers and employees." 'Best features of DB, DC plans' From an employer's point of view, target benefits provide a middle ground between DB and DC plans at a time when many organiza- tions are freezing DB contribu- tions, said Kim Ozubko, pension counsel at Miller omson in To- ronto, speaking on the panel. Many companies are struggling to maintain DB plans, and have shifted to DC plans, group RRSPs or thrift savings plans (TSPs), she said. "Many employers are quite simply no longer interested in the risk, the instability, the uncertain costs associated with DB plans." It's high time the country's pub- lic and private sectors looked at alternate benefit options, she said. "e DB ship has already sailed and we need to look at other retire- ment saving options for employees if we are serious about providing retirement savings as part of a ben- efit package." And while target benefit plans are relatively new in the single-em- ployer context, they may provide an answer in the shifting pension landscape, said Ozubko. "ey allow the financial risk to be shared between the polar ex- tremes of the DC plans — which have uncertain benefits but have certain contribution requirements — and DB plans, which have rela- tively certain benefits and uncer- tain contribution requirements." Yet while employers have shown interest in the model, many are still taking a conservative approach to target benefits, she said. "The consent provisions may make it difficult for some employ- ers to converge or transfer DB to DC. I, certainly from the clients I speak to, see interest in target ben- efit plans, but I think many (em- ployers) are taking a wait-and-see approach at this point." 'is is an unprincipled piece of legislation' But from an employee point of view, the bill reverses pension promises and allows decisions such as Sears' to become legal, said Mark Janson, senior re- searcher at the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE). (The retailer's underfunded pension plan could see mem- bers receiving significantly less in benefits.) In essence, the bill would allow a promised pension to retroactively become an unpromised pension, he said. "Under C-27, already earned defined benefit promises that an employer has made to a worker, for work they have already done, can be overnight converted into tar- get benefits, which do not hold an employer-backed promise to pay a specific amount in retirement," said Janson, speaking at the panel. "ey are not legally binding and can be reduced without limits." It's deal-breaking, he said. "To us, this is an unprincipled piece of this legislation and has been the focus of our opposition... We just think that this is wrong for an employer to get such a windfall in one round of bargaining. An em- ployer can effectively recoup com- pensation from 10, 20, 30 years of past bargaining overnight, if this legislation passes. Overnight, it shifts the bargaining goalposts far down the field in favour of the employer." It is a widely held view that em- ployers need to make good on their promises to workers, said Janson. "We see this right now in the public debate around Sears," he said. "e public is outraged about Sears and the fact that these work- ers and retirees are not getting what was promised to them." is is a massive shift in our pen- sion system, said Janson. "e point of pension regula- tion law was to better protect pen- sion promises. is goes the other way… Employers who have a DB plan can effectively get what they want, shifting risk to workers." e opposition is not to tradi- tional target benefit plans in the- ory, but rather the threat it poses to workers in the single-employer context, said Laura Brownell, staff representative for pensions at the Society of Energy Professionals, speaking at the panel. "If enacted, it will support a prec- edent that threatens the earned pension benefits of thousands of Canadian workers," she said. "Sin- gle-employer target plans put ac- crued benefits at risk in the context of CCAA (Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act) restructuring." "e DB ship has already sailed and we need to look at other options for employees if we are serious about providing retirement savings." Finance Minister Bill Morneau has been in the spotlight recently with suggestions of a conflict of interest as the implementation of target benefit plans could benefit his former firm, Morneau Shepell. Credit: Chris Wattie (Reuters) Multigenerational recruitment With four different generations in the workforce, employers face a unique set of challenges in attracting, recruiting and retaining talent. We talk to experts from Deloitte and n-gen People Performance to get their insights. Here we go again on random drug and alcohol testing Back-and-forth battle between Suncor and union over random testing at oilsands operations follows pattern of previous cases In any language, Montreal is a gem – so don't fret about 'Bonjour-hi' But governments getting involved in the language employees use to greet customers is kinda weird, no? Employers fret about hazy rules around pot use Research slow to keep up with demand for information Flu cases showing up earlier than usual, could be harbinger of bad season: Experts Annual sneezing-coughing season began early this year BLOGS BRIEFS FEATURED VIDEO BLOGS BRIEFS FEATURED VIDEO BLOGS BRIEFS FEATURED VIDEO Recent videos, stories and blogs posted on www.hrreporter.com. Check the website daily for updates from Canada and around the world.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian HR Reporter - January 2018 CAN