Canadian HR Reporter

July 2018 CAN

Canadian HR Reporter is the national journal of human resource management. It features the latest workplace news, HR best practices, employment law commentary and tools and tips for employers to get the most out of their workforce.

Issue link: https://digital.hrreporter.com/i/996530

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 4 of 39

CANADIAN HR REPORTER JULY 2018 EMPLOYMENT LAW 5 Changes to remote work arrangement, bonus add up to constructive dismissal An Ontario company constructively dis- missed a long-time employee when it unilaterally changed her 22-year work- from-home arrangement and dramati- cally reduced her last quarterly bonus, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has ruled. Rosemary Hagholm, 60, began working at MicroAge, an IT ser- vices company based in Toronto, in 1982. After 10 years, she quit because she had moved to Water- loo, Ont., more than 100 kilome- tres away. Two years later, a vice-president at MicroAge asked Hagholm if she would come back on a six-month contract. Hagholm agreed to the temporary position. However, at the end of the contract, she was offered a full-time position. She accepted the offer on the condition that she could work from home three days a week and commute to the office twice a week. Hagholm worked for Micro- Age under this arrangement for two decades. In 2000, she became a manager for consulting services and was responsible for staffing and budgeting. Her compensation included an annual bonus. In 2015, MicroAge was sold to Coreio, another IT company. In 2017, Coreio changed her posi- tion to resource manager in ad- visory services as part of business restructuring. According to Hagholm, her workload increased because she was no longer allowed to use ex- ternal recruitment agencies to fill job vacancies, requiring her to do recruiting, screening and on- boarding job candidates herself. Coreio also gave Hagholm a performance improvement plan that included complaints about her performance, such as poor punctuation and grammar. e company also had concerns about declining performance since the summer of 2016, including a fail- ure to interview potential candi- dates for a client and not submit- ting an ad to a client for approval before posting it. Hagholm was expected to at- tend weekly meetings with her supervisor to discuss her progress and submit reports every week. She was also told that her bo- nus for the fourth quarter of 2016 would be $6,739, a significant decrease from her usual amount, which was always close to or at the maximum entitlement of $18,000. MicroAge had told her bonuses were tied to company revenue, but Coreio management informed her they were partly discretion- ary, though they couldn't tell her how it was calculated. Finally, Coreio told Hagholm she was expected to work full- time at the office. No compensa- tion was offered to offset her in- creased commuting costs as it said the work-from-home arrange- ment wasn't a term or condition of her employment and there was no written employment contract that entitled her to such an ar- rangement on a permanent basis. On March 1, 2017, Hagholm resigned her position because of the new work schedule, new reporting requirements, and bonus reduction. She also filed a claim for con- structive dismissal, though Coreio argued she had never indicated concerns about her performance improvement plan or working in the office five days a week. Agreement breached: Court e court found that when Hag- holm was rehired to permanent employment status in 1995, she negotiated an agreement in which working from home three days a week was a condition for accept- ing the job offer. ough there was no written contract, the verbal agreement she had with Micro- Age's vice-president was real. As a result, working from home 60 per cent of the time was an es- sential term of Hagholm's employ- ment agreement. When Coreio changed this term, it unilaterally breached the agreement and con- structively dismissed Hagholm, said the court. Requiring Hagholm to com- mute 220 kms round-trip for an additional three days a week would add significant costs in time, vehicle maintenance, fuel, and risk on the busy highways, said the court. In addition, Hagholm's bonus was arbitrarily set by Coreio to a significantly lower level — 37.44 per cent of the maximum amount, after she received 90 to 100 per cent every year previously. This was a contravention of Hagholm's employment con- tract, since there was nothing indicating the bonus was tied to performance. Since Coreio constructively dismissed Hagholm by changing key elements of her employment contract — the work-from-home arrangement and the amount received for her quarterly bonus — Hagholm was entitled to dam- ages in lieu of termination notice, determined the court. Hagholm argued all 35 years of her service with MicroAge and Coreio should be factored in, but the court found no justification for including the 10 years before she quit in 1992. As a result, Hagholm had 22 years of service, entitling her to 22 months of service, less the one- and-one-half months' severance she had already received. The court also determined Hagholm was entitled to the maximum 2016 fourth-quarter bonus, consistent with previous bonuses, ordering Coreio to pay her $11,261 to bring her total bo- nus to the usual $18,000. For more information, see: • Hagholm v. Coreio Inc., 2017 CarswellOnt 21149 (Ont. S.C.J.). Jeffrey Smith is the editor of C an a di an Emp l o y m e n t L a w Today. For more information, visit www.employmentlawtoday.com. Jeffrey Smith Legal View Join us as we celebrate the best human resources practices in Canada. Presented by Canadian HR Reporter and Thomson Reuters, the fourth annual awards honour individuals and teams from HR departments across the country. New for 2018! The awards have expanded into a full gala event featuring cocktails and a dinner. It's an unique opportunity to network with your peers and discover the practices of the best professionals in the nation. HR AWARDS 2018 NATIONAL Brought to you by Sponsors VENNGO HEALTHY WORKPLACES AWARD EMPLOYMENT LAWYER OF THE YEAR AWARD FRAGOMEN WORLDWIDE BEST DIVERSITY INITIATIVE AWARD BENCHMARK BENEFIT SOLUTIONS TOP BENEFITS ADMINISTRATOR AWARD QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY IRC PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AWARD HUMANACARE HR PROFESSIONAL OF THE YEAR AWARD Date: Sept. 27, 2018 Venue: The Ritz-Carlton, Toronto (181 Wellington Street) Cocktails: 5:30 p.m. Dinner: 6:30 p.m. Dress: Business Emcee: Todd Humber, Publisher/Editor-in-Chief, Canadian HR Reporter nationalhrawards.com To order tables or individual tickets, contact Paul Burton at paul.burton@tr.com or (416) 649-9928.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian HR Reporter - July 2018 CAN