Canadian HR Reporter

September 18, 2017 CAN

Canadian HR Reporter is the national journal of human resource management. It features the latest workplace news, HR best practices, employment law commentary and tools and tips for employers to get the most out of their workforce.

Issue link: https://digital.hrreporter.com/i/870254

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 11 of 19

CANADIAN HR REPORTER September 18, 2017 12 FEATURES RELOCATION Less inclined to move Why are global employees increasingly resistant to relocations? By Stephen Cryne D emographic shifts of un- precedented proportions are underway in many of the world's developed nations. At the same time, rapid advances in technology are creating new demands for talent and disrupt- ing many workplaces. Com- bined, these complex forces are making it increasingly diffi cult for companies to manage and set strategy. Shortages of skilled workers are impacting economic growth and business expansion around the globe. The supply of highly skilled workers is not growing fast enough to meet the increasing demand, and access to key talent is a priority for many of today's CEOs — 77 per cent of global executives worry that skills short- ages could impair their compa- ny's growth, according to a 2017 PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) report based on interviews with 379 leaders in 79 countries. A large part of the solution to these challenges, and securing a supply of skilled labour, lies in greater mobility of the work- force and increased economic migration. But there's been a noticeable decline in the willingness of em- ployees when it comes to making a move for work — even when attractive incentives are off ered by the employer, according to the 2017 Global Mobility Survey, re- leased by the Canadian Employee Relocation Council (CERC) in partnership with Ipsos Global Public Aff airs. About two in 10 (18 per cent) employees in 20 countries say they would be "very likely" to temporarily relocate for up to two years and take a full-time job in another country with a 10 per cent pay increase, found the survey of 10,091 employees in 20 countries. By comparison, in 2012, one- quarter (25 per cent) of employees said they would be "very likely" to take a full-time job in another country. Furthermore, 40 per cent of global employees agree there is nothing their employer can do to convince them to take an inter- national assignment, compared to 35 per cent in 2012, found the survey. Gauging interest Globally, more than one-quarter (27 per cent) of employees are "somewhat likely" while just un- der one-quarter (23 per cent) are "not very likely" and three in 10 (31 per cent) are "not at all likely" to relocate. Less than one-fifth (17 per cent) would be willing to relocate permanently in 2017. If there is a guarantee of a full-time job, the proportion indicating they are very likely to relocate increases to 28 per cent, but drops signifi - cantly if there is no such guarantee (seven per cent). Among Canadian workers, 19 per cent (a similar proportion compared to 2012) are "very likely," 23 per cent are "somewhat likely," 19 per cent are "not very likely" and 39 per cent are "not at all likely" to relocate for employ- ment — signifi cantly more than in 2012 when only 26 per cent said they would be not at all likely to relocate. Among those Canadians who indicated they are "likely" to move, potential barriers include family and friends (40 per cent), followed by location (10 per cent), money/fi nancial stability/salary (nine per cent) and job security (eight per cent). One of the most important in- centives to an employee consid- ering a move is the guaranteed option to return to their current role after two years (36 per cent), found the survey. Among those who indicated they are "unlikely" to move, the top incentives that might make them consider the move are a pay increase (27 per cent) and the country of the relocation (six per cent). But more than four in 10 (43 per cent) said nothing would make them consider relocation, found the survey. However, global employees are less motivated than they were in 2012 to relocate by virtually all incentives. Top barriers to an employee making the move include his con- cerns about the family and spou- sal employment. e importance of government policy and relocation is also evi- dent in the 2017 survey. A majority of global employ- ees, 82 per cent, said they would only move to a country that has high-quality health care, and 77 per cent would only move to a country that is welcoming to immigrants. Both factors work in Canada's favour in attracting talented glob- al recruits. United States holds top spot More than one-third (37 per cent) of employees surveyed "strongly agree" that the location of the foreign work assignment is a ma- jor factor in their determining whether they want to relocate or stay put. While the United States contin- ues to remain the preferred choice for employees, down slightly from 2012, Canada moved up to second spot as a destination (up from fourth in 2012) and the United Kingdom and Australia rounded out the third and fourth spots respectively. In Canada, employees are most likely to pick Australia (40 per cent), the United States (37 per cent) or the United Kingdom (30 per cent) as their preferred op- tions for workplace relocation. In an interesting twist, the number of employees in Mexico selecting the U.S. as one of their three choices declined heav- ily from one-half (52 per cent) in 2012 to just one-quarter (26 per cent) in 2017, found the recent survey. Employee relocation will con- tinue to be a key factor in devel- oping an organization's global leadership competency, fulfi lling business needs and addressing talent shortages. is survey points to the grow- ing complexities of relocation and the needs of employees that must be considered by employers in properly managing employee mobility. Stephen Cryne is president and CEO of the Canadian Employee Reloca- tion Council (CERC), a not-for-profi t organization in Toronto. For more in- formation, visit www.cerc.ca. One of the most important incentives to an employee considering a move is the guaranteed option to return to their current role after two years. Top global choices for relocations UNITED STATES CANADA UNITED KINGDOM AUSTRALIA GERMANY SWITZERLAND SPAIN NEW ZEALAND FRANCE ITALY 30% 23% 20% 20% 17% 17% 14% 13% 12% 12% Spiralbound • August 2017 $48* • L7798-7856 ISBN • 978-0-7798-7856-7 Multiple copy discounts available *Plus applicable taxes and shipping & handling (Prices subject to change without notice) Order your copy today. Visit www.carswell.com or call 1-800-387-5164 for a 30-day, no risk evaluation Alberta Legal Telephone Directory 2017-18 is all about your legal community connecting you to the lawyers and law offices you need in Alberta, Northwest Territories, Nunavut and Yukon. Published annually, it keeps you connected with new and updated names, mailing addresses, email addresses, phone numbers and fax numbers each year. Quickly and easily access: • Law Societies • Courts of Appeal • Federal Court of Canada • Government of Canada departments • Judicial districts and judicial officials • Incorporated Municipalities • Land registration and information services • Provincial government departments • Boards and Commissions • Law Related Services, Institutions and Organizations • University law faculties ... and more Connecting you to your LEGAL COMMUNITY

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian HR Reporter - September 18, 2017 CAN